Arguments for free trade are sometimes disregarded by politicians because:

 Options:

a. Maximizing domestic efficiency is not considered important b. Maximizing consumer welfare may not be a chief priority c. There exist sound economic reasons for keeping one’s economy isolated from other economies. d. Economists tend to favor highly protected domestic markets

The Correct Answer Is:

b. Maximizing consumer welfare may not be a chief priority

Correct Answer Explanation: b. Maximizing consumer welfare may not be a chief priority.

Free trade is a concept in economics that advocates for the unrestricted exchange of goods and services between countries without government-imposed barriers such as tariffs, quotas, and subsidies.

It is based on the idea that when countries specialize in producing the goods and services they are most efficient at, and then trade with one another, overall economic welfare increases.

Now, let’s delve into why this answer is correct:

b. Maximizing consumer welfare may not be a chief priority:

Politicians may disregard arguments for free trade because they may prioritize other goals over consumer welfare. They may focus on protecting certain industries or preserving jobs, even if it means imposing trade restrictions that limit consumer choice and increase prices.

Additionally, they may face pressure from interest groups or lobbyists representing industries that would benefit from protectionist policies. These groups may have significant influence over politicians, leading them to prioritize the interests of specific industries over the broader benefits of free trade.

Now, let’s address why the other options are not correct:

a. Maximizing domestic efficiency is not considered important:

This statement is not accurate. Maximizing domestic efficiency is a fundamental principle in economics and is often cited as one of the key benefits of free trade. When countries specialize in producing the goods and services they are most efficient at, overall productivity and economic welfare increase.

Therefore, it is unlikely that politicians would disregard this important aspect of economic theory.

c. There exist sound economic reasons for keeping one’s economy isolated from other economies:

This statement contradicts the well-established economic consensus in favor of free trade. While there may be certain situations where limited protectionist measures are temporarily implemented for strategic or national security reasons, keeping an economy isolated from other economies is generally considered detrimental to overall economic welfare.

The benefits of free trade in terms of increased efficiency, consumer welfare, and economic growth far outweigh the potential drawbacks.

d. Economists tend to favor highly protected domestic markets:

This statement is not accurate. Economists generally advocate for free trade and argue against highly protected domestic markets. The consensus among economists is that free trade leads to greater overall economic welfare, as it allows countries to specialize in what they do best and benefit from comparative advantage.

Highly protected domestic markets can lead to inefficiencies, higher prices for consumers, and limited innovation due to reduced competition.

In conclusion, the correct answer, b. Maximizing consumer welfare may not be a chief priority, aligns with the understanding that politicians may have other priorities or pressures that lead them to disregard the arguments for free trade, even though it is widely supported by economic theory for its potential to benefit overall economic welfare.

The other options are not correct as they either misrepresent economic principles or go against the prevailing consensus among economists. Politicians may sometimes overlook the benefits of free trade due to a focus on protecting specific industries, pressure from interest groups, or a prioritization of other goals over maximizing consumer welfare.

Related Posts

• Free traders maintain that an open economy is advantageous in that it provides all of the following except:
• If the international terms of trade settle at a level that is between each country’s opportunity cost