Management Notes

Reference Notes for Management

Export subsidies levied by foreign governments on products in which the United States has comparative disadvantage:

Export subsidies levied by foreign governments on products in which the United States has comparative disadvantage:

 Options:

a. lower the welfare of all Americans
b. lead to increases in U.S. consumer surplus
c. encourage U.S. production of competing goods
d. encourage U.S. workers to demand higher wages

The Correct Answer Is:

b. lead to increases in U.S. consumer surplus

Impact of Foreign Export Subsidies on U.S. Economy

Export subsidies imposed by foreign governments on products in which the United States has a comparative disadvantage can have significant economic implications for the U.S. economy. Among the provided options, “b. lead to increases in U.S. consumer surplus” is the correct answer.

This is because export subsidies by foreign governments can result in lower prices for imported goods in the U.S. market, leading to an expansion of consumer surplus. In this discussion, we will delve into the reasoning behind why this option is correct, and subsequently, we will explore why the other options are not suitable in this context.

Explanation of the Correct Answer:

b. Lead to Increases in U.S. Consumer Surplus

When foreign governments impose export subsidies on products, it means that they are providing financial incentives to their domestic producers to encourage exports.

This results in an increase in the quantity of these subsidized products available in the international market. As a consequence, these products become more abundant and cheaper for U.S. consumers.

With an increase in the availability of these subsidized products, consumers in the United States can purchase them at lower prices, which leads to an expansion of consumer surplus. Consumer surplus represents the difference between what consumers are willing to pay for a product and what they actually pay.

When prices decrease due to export subsidies, consumers can purchase more goods at prices lower than what they were initially willing to pay. This surplus can be spent on other goods and services, thus enhancing overall economic well-being.

Explanation of Incorrect Options:

a. Lower the Welfare of All Americans

While it may seem intuitive that export subsidies imposed by foreign governments could harm the welfare of all Americans, this statement is not entirely accurate. In fact, export subsidies can lead to an increase in consumer surplus, which benefits consumers by allowing them to purchase goods at lower prices.

However, it is important to note that this benefit may come at the expense of domestic producers who face increased competition from subsidized foreign products. Therefore, while there may be winners (consumers) and losers (domestic producers) in this scenario, it does not necessarily lower the overall welfare of all Americans.

c. Encourage U.S. Production of Competing Goods

This option implies that export subsidies by foreign governments would lead to an increase in the production of competing goods in the U.S. However, this statement is not accurate in the context of export subsidies.

Export subsidies in foreign countries are designed to promote the production and export of specific goods from those countries, not to stimulate the production of similar goods in the importing country. Therefore, this option is not relevant to the scenario described.

d. Encourage U.S. Workers to Demand Higher Wages

Export subsidies do not directly influence U.S. workers’ demand for higher wages. The factors that influence wage demands in the U.S. are primarily related to domestic economic conditions, labor market dynamics, and government policies.

While export subsidies can have indirect effects on the economy, they do not directly lead to an increase in U.S. workers’ demands for higher wages. Therefore, this option is not the correct answer in this context.

In conclusion, export subsidies imposed by foreign governments on products in which the United States has comparative disadvantage can lead to increases in U.S. consumer surplus.

This is due to the lower prices of imported goods in the U.S. market, allowing consumers to purchase more at prices lower than their initial willingness to pay. The other options provided are not relevant in this context, as they do not accurately depict the impact of foreign export subsidies on the U.S. economy.

Related Posts

Leave a Comment