This option suggests that firms with limited competitive resources might completely abstain from responding to competitive actions. However, this extreme stance is not a common or practical approach in the business world.
Even if a company is resource-constrained, it will typically make some attempt to respond to competitive actions, albeit with some delays.
This is because competition is inherent in any industry, and ignoring it entirely could lead to significant losses in market share and profitability. Therefore, while a delayed response might be more likely, a complete non-response is highly improbable.
B. respond quickly to competitive actions.
This option proposes that firms with limited competitive resources would have a tendency to respond swiftly to competitive actions. However, this contradicts the fundamental premise that limited resources hinder a company’s ability to react promptly.
Responding quickly often requires a high level of agility and resources that companies with constraints in competitive resources may not possess.
Rapid responses typically necessitate the allocation of substantial resources in terms of research and development, marketing efforts, and operational adjustments. Without these resources readily available, a firm is more likely to experience delays in its response.
D. respond to strategic actions, but not to tactical actions.
This option introduces a distinction between strategic and tactical actions, implying that firms with limited competitive resources might be more inclined to respond to strategic actions but not to tactical ones.
However, this distinction is not directly related to the issue of competitive resources. Whether a firm responds to strategic or tactical actions is more dependent on its overall business strategy, capabilities, and market circumstances, rather than solely its level of competitive resources.
Therefore, firms with limited resources may still aim to respond to both types of actions, albeit potentially with delays stemming from their resource constraints. This option doesn’t adequately address the fundamental issue of resource limitations and their impact on response times.
In summary, while the correct answer (Option C) is the most plausible outcome for firms with limited competitive resources, it’s crucial to recognize that individual firm strategies and unique circumstances may lead to variations in their responses.
However, the other options presented do not align with the inherent challenges that come with having constrained competitive resources in the business landscape.