“sociologists argue that, unlike scientific knowledge, commonsense conclusions are not “
- Published
- Reliable
- politically correct
- easily disseminated
Answer: b. Reliable
Answer Explanation
According to sociologists, commonsense conclusions are not reliable, unlike scientific knowledge. A person’s common sense is the knowledge and beliefs that they develop as a result of their experiences, observations, and interactions with other people.
Sociologists caution against relying solely on common sense to understand complex social phenomena since it is prone to biases, stereotypes, and limited perspectives.
Why the other options are not correct
a. Published:
The option “Published” is not the correct answer since publication of knowledge is not the primary distinction between scientific knowledge and common sense. Common sense is not typically published in the same formal manner as scientific knowledge, which undergoes a rigorous peer review process before publication. Despite the lack of publication, common sense does not differ from scientific knowledge in any significant way.
c. Politically Correct:
The option “Politically correct” is incorrect because the political correctness of knowledge does not differentiate between scientific knowledge and common sense. Cultural norms, ideologies, and values can influence both scientific knowledge and common sense.
The difference is in the rigorous methods and empirical evidence used in scientific inquiry, which aim to reduce biases and subjectivity, whereas common sense may be influenced by social norms that may or may not align with current political correctness.
d. Easily Disseminated
The option “Easily disseminated” is not the correct answer because both scientific knowledge and common sense can be disseminated to varying degrees. Research knowledge can be published in academic journals, books, or presented at conferences, making it accessible to other researchers as well as the general public. The same is true of common sense, which is widely shared through everyday interactions, conversations, and informal channels. The difference is in the methods used to generate knowledge (scientific versus everyday experiences) and in the reliability of the conclusions.
Conclusion
According to sociologists, commonsense conclusions are not reliable, unlike scientific knowledge. Common sense might seem intuitive and widely accepted, but it can be influenced by biases, stereotypes, and limited perspectives. A scientific knowledge is, on the other hand, the result of rigorous research methods, empirical evidence, and peer review, which aim to minimize biases and boost reliability.
In order to gain a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of complex social phenomena, sociologists emphasize the importance of scientific methods and critical thinking. Sociologists contribute to the advancement of knowledge and the development of evidence-based solutions to social problems by recognizing the limitations of common sense and promoting rigorous scientific inquiry.
Why is choosing a random sample an effective way to select participants?
I am Bibisha Shiwakoti a final year BBS student from Janapremi College. I have completed my higher secondary education at Kalinchowk Secondary School.
- AT&T Competitors – Top 10 Major Competitors of AT&T | Competitors Analysis - January 2, 2024
- ASOS Competitors – Top 10 Major Competitors of ASOS | Competitors Analysis - January 1, 2024
- ASML Competitors – Top 10 Major Competitors of ASML | Competitors Analysis - January 1, 2024