Management Notes

Reference Notes for Management

The national security argument for protection is more likely to be valid when

The national security argument for protection is more likely to be valid when

 Options:

a. the purpose is to maintain protection for an indefinite time period
b. the industry is characterized by increasing returns to scale
c. the economy operates during a recession
d the protected industry provides invaluable goods during periods of war

The Correct Answer Is:

d the protected industry provides invaluable goods during periods of war

Correct Answer Explanation: d the protected industry provides invaluable goods during periods of war

The national security argument for protection is considered valid when the protected industry provides invaluable goods during periods of war. This argument asserts that protecting certain industries through trade barriers is necessary for a country’s security and defense capabilities.

When a nation can produce essential goods domestically, it reduces its reliance on foreign sources during times of conflict, ensuring a stable supply chain for vital materials and resources needed for national defense.

During periods of war, the uninterrupted availability of critical goods like weaponry, ammunition, military equipment, and strategic resources becomes paramount for a nation’s ability to defend itself and conduct military operations effectively.

Relying on imports for such crucial items could potentially lead to vulnerabilities and disruptions if foreign sources become unreliable due to geopolitical tensions, trade disputes, or other conflicts of interest.

Why other options are Incorrect?

Now, let’s discuss why the other options listed are not correct in this context:

a. The purpose is to maintain protection for an indefinite time period:

This option addresses the duration of protection. While it is true that some industries may require long-term protection for various reasons, including national security concerns, the length of time for which protection is maintained is not the primary criterion for evaluating the validity of the national security argument.

The key consideration is whether the industry in question provides goods or services that are crucial for a nation’s defense capabilities, particularly during times of war.

b. The industry is characterized by increasing returns to scale:

Increasing returns to scale refer to the economic concept where a company or industry becomes more efficient and cost-effective as it produces more. While this can be an important factor for evaluating the competitiveness and efficiency of industries, it is not directly related to the national security argument for protection.

National security considerations focus on ensuring that a country has access to essential goods and resources needed for its defense, regardless of the scale of production.

c. The economy operates during a recession:

A recession is a period of economic decline characterized by reduced economic activity, employment, and consumer spending. While economic conditions can certainly impact various industries, including those related to defense and security, the occurrence of a recession is not a determining factor for the validity of the national security argument.

National security concerns are distinct from short-term economic fluctuations and are primarily centered around ensuring a country’s ability to defend itself and maintain its security interests.

In summary, the national security argument for protection is fundamentally about safeguarding industries that provide crucial goods and resources necessary for a country’s defense capabilities, particularly during times of war.

The other options (a, b, and c) either address different aspects of trade policy or economic conditions that, while important in their own right, do not directly pertain to the national security argument.

Related Posts

Leave a Comment