What would most effectively describe the risk of incorrect acceptance in terms of substantive audit testing?

 Options:

a) The auditor has ascertained that the balance is materially correct when in actual fact it is not b) The auditor concludes the balance is materially misstated when in actual fact is not c) The auditor has rejected an item from sample which was not supported by documentary evidence d) He applies random sampling on data which is inaccurate and inconsistent

The Correct Answer Is:

a) The auditor has ascertained that the balance is materially correct when in actual fact it is not

Correct Answer Explanation: a) The auditor has ascertained that the balance is materially correct when in actual fact it is not

When considering the risk of incorrect acceptance in substantive audit testing, it’s crucial to grasp the intricacies of verifying financial balances for accuracy. Incorrect acceptance implies a scenario where the auditor mistakenly perceives a balance as materially correct when, in reality, it contains material misstatements or errors.

Option (a) states that the auditor has ascertained that the balance is materially correct when it actually isn’t. This situation represents the risk of incorrect acceptance due to an erroneous conclusion about the accuracy of the balance.

The risk of incorrect acceptance, as outlined in option (a), is a critical concern in substantive audit testing. This risk arises when the auditor, despite conducting testing procedures, erroneously concludes that a financial balance is materially correct when, in reality, it harbors material misstatements or errors.

This situation can stem from various factors such as inadequate sampling, insufficient evidence, or misinterpretation of audit findings. Addressing this risk requires auditors to implement robust procedures, including comprehensive testing methodologies, meticulous documentation review, and a keen eye for detecting potential misstatements.

Mitigating this risk is essential to maintain the integrity and reliability of financial statements, ensuring accuracy in reporting for stakeholders and regulatory compliance.

Let’s delve deeper into why the other options do not accurately portray the risk of incorrect acceptance in substantive audit testing:

b) “The auditor concludes the balance is materially misstated when in actual fact is not”:

This scenario suggests that the auditor identifies a material misstatement where none exists. It reflects the risk of over-auditing or overestimating errors, potentially leading to unnecessary adjustments in financial statements.

However, it doesn’t align directly with incorrect acceptance. In this case, the risk revolves more around an overstatement or an erroneous identification of errors rather than accepting an inaccurate balance as materially correct.

c) “The auditor has rejected an item from the sample which was not supported by documentary evidence”:

This option points towards the risk of omission or exclusion based on insufficient documentary evidence. While it highlights the importance of documentary evidence in supporting audit conclusions, it does not directly address the risk of accepting an incorrect balance.

Rejecting an item due to lack of documentation could result in incomplete assessments, but it doesn’t specifically represent the risk of accepting a materially incorrect balance.

d) “He applies random sampling on data which is inaccurate and inconsistent”:

This scenario focuses on the quality of the data used for sampling rather than the specific risk of incorrect acceptance. Utilizing inaccurate or inconsistent data for sampling purposes can undoubtedly compromise the reliability of audit conclusions.

However, the risk outlined here primarily pertains to the quality of data, not directly to the risk of accepting a balance as materially correct when it contains misstatements.

In summary, while each of these scenarios highlights potential risks in the audit process, they don’t accurately encapsulate the specific risk of incorrect acceptance.

This risk is uniquely tied to the auditor mistakenly affirming the material correctness of a balance despite underlying material misstatements or errors, necessitating a distinct focus on the accuracy of reported balances in substantive audit testing.

Related Posts

• Which of the following statement is true regarding an auditor’s working papers?
• Which of the following features is most important for random-based selection?