Management Notes

Reference Notes for Management

Which best describes the results of a case study?

Which best describes the results of a case study?


a. It produces more reliable results than other methods because of its depth
b. Its results are not generally applicable
c. It relies solely on secondary data analysis
d. All of the above

The Correct Answer Is:

b. Its results are not generally applicable

Correct Answer Explanation: b. Its results are not generally applicable

Option b is correct because case studies are in-depth, detailed examinations of specific instances or phenomena. They are typically conducted on a single case or a small number of cases, and are often used in fields like psychology, sociology, anthropology, and medicine.

Due to their narrow focus, the findings of a case study may not be easily generalized to larger populations or different contexts.

Case studies provide rich, detailed information about a specific case, allowing researchers to explore complex relationships, contexts, and processes in depth. This depth is a strength of case studies, as it allows for a thorough understanding of the particular case being studied.

However, this depth also limits the generalizability of the findings. Because case studies are focused on specific cases, they may not be representative of broader populations or situations.

Now, let’s discuss why the other options are not correct:

a. “It produces more reliable results than other methods because of its depth”

This option is not entirely accurate. While case studies do offer a high level of depth and detail about specific cases, it doesn’t necessarily mean that their results are more reliable than other research methods.

Reliability in research refers to the consistency and stability of results when the study is conducted again under similar conditions. The depth of a case study does not guarantee a higher level of reliability.

Moreover, the reliability of any research method depends on factors like the study design, data collection methods, and the quality of the data itself. Therefore, it would be misleading to state that case studies are inherently more reliable than other methods solely based on their depth.

c. “It relies solely on secondary data analysis”

This option is also incorrect. While case studies can incorporate secondary data, which refers to data collected by someone else for a different purpose, they are not limited to secondary data analysis. In fact, case studies often involve a combination of primary and secondary data.

Primary data is collected directly from the case through methods like interviews, observations, or surveys. Secondary data, on the other hand, might include existing records, documents, or previously published research.

Depending on the specific case and research question, a case study may heavily rely on primary data collection or use a mix of both primary and secondary data.

d. “All of the above”

This option is incorrect because options a and c are not accurate descriptions of case studies, as explained above. Combining them with option b, which is accurate, would lead to an inaccurate statement about case studies.

In summary, options a, c, and d are not accurate descriptions of case studies. It’s important to understand that while case studies offer valuable insights into specific cases, they have their strengths and limitations, and their results may not always be generalizable to broader populations or contexts. This is a key characteristic that distinguishes them from other research methods.

Related Posts

Leave a Comment