Which of the following factors likely to be identified as a fraud factor by the auditor?
Options:
a) The company is planning a initial public offer of quality shares to raise additional capital for expansion. b) Bank reconciliation statement includes deposits-in-transit. c) Plant and machinery is sold at a loss. d) The company has made political contributions. |
The Correct Answer Is:
a) The company is planning a initial public offer of quality shares to raise additional capital for expansion.
let’s break down each option to understand why the auditor might consider them as potential fraud factors.
a) The company is planning an initial public offer of quality shares to raise additional capital for expansion.
Why it might be identified as a fraud factor:
Auditors might view this as a potential red flag because sometimes, companies under financial duress or with struggling financial performance might resort to fraudulent practices before going public.
They could manipulate financial statements to inflate numbers, misrepresent performance, or conceal existing issues to attract investors. There could be pressure to present a rosy financial picture to entice investors, leading to unethical practices.
Why the other options might not be identified as fraud factors:
b) Bank reconciliation statement includes deposits-in-transit.
This is a typical accounting practice and doesn’t inherently signal fraud. Deposits in transit are funds that have been received and recorded by the company but have not yet been reflected in the bank statement due to the time lag in processing. It’s a reconciling item that needs adjustment but is not indicative of fraud by itself.
c) Plant and machinery is sold at a loss.
Selling assets at a loss might indicate poor business decisions or market conditions, but it doesn’t necessarily indicate fraud. Companies often sell assets for various reasons, including strategic shifts, technological advancements, or restructuring plans.
Unless there’s evidence of deliberate misrepresentation or manipulation in the sale process to deceive stakeholders, this isn’t inherently fraudulent.
d) The company has made political contributions.
Political contributions, while potentially controversial or raising ethical concerns, aren’t typically considered fraudulent unless there’s evidence that these contributions were used to obtain some illicit advantage or were misrepresented in the financial statements.
Ethical issues surrounding political contributions might prompt additional scrutiny, but on their own, they don’t directly signify fraud.
Fraud is a deliberate act to deceive and manipulate financial statements or other records. While certain actions or situations might raise concerns or require further investigation, they don’t always equate to fraud.
Auditors look for patterns, inconsistencies, and evidence of intentional deception or misrepresentation when assessing potential fraud factors. In the case of the initial public offer, the pressure to present an attractive image might prompt unethical behavior, hence why it stands out as a potential red flag.
Related Posts
- Which of the following is the most appropriate potential reaction of the auditor to his assessment that the risk of material misstatement due to fraud is high in relation to existence of inventory?
- Which of the following is not a quality control consideration on accepting a new client?
- Price policy mainly benefits - October 1, 2022
- The three major types of ethical issues include except? - October 1, 2022
- The shortest distance between any two dots of the same color is called ………………. - October 1, 2022