Which group used the legal system to challenge racial discrimination?
A) the UNIA
B) the NAACP
C) the IWW
D) the NWSA
The Correct Answer for the given question is Option B) the NAACP
The correct answer is B) the NAACP, which stands for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. The NAACP played a pivotal role in using the legal system to challenge racial discrimination in the United States. Below, I will provide a detailed explanation of why the NAACP is the correct choice and why the other options are not:
B) The NAACP:
The NAACP was founded in 1909 with the primary goal of combating racial discrimination and promoting civil rights for African Americans. It became one of the most influential civil rights organizations in American history.
The NAACP understood that one of the most effective ways to challenge racial discrimination was through the legal system. They employed various legal strategies and tactics to challenge segregation, voter suppression, and other discriminatory practices.
One of the most famous legal victories achieved by the NAACP was the landmark Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education in 1954. In this case, the NAACP’s legal team successfully argued that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional, leading to the desegregation of American public education. This case marked a significant turning point in the fight against racial discrimination in the United States.
Additionally, the NAACP was instrumental in organizing legal challenges to voting restrictions and discriminatory voting practices that disproportionately affected African Americans. Their efforts culminated in the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which aimed to eliminate racial discrimination in voting.
The NAACP also worked on other legal fronts, such as challenging housing segregation, employment discrimination, and police brutality. Through its Legal Defense and Educational Fund (LDF), the organization employed a team of skilled attorneys, including figures like Thurgood Marshall, who later became the first African American Supreme Court Justice. These lawyers skillfully litigated cases in courts across the country, strategically challenging discriminatory laws and practices.
A) The UNIA (Universal Negro Improvement Association):
The UNIA, founded by Marcus Garvey in the early 20th century, was primarily focused on promoting black self-sufficiency, pride, and economic independence. While it was an important organization in the Black empowerment movement, it did not primarily use the legal system to challenge racial discrimination.
Instead, the UNIA’s approach was more focused on economic empowerment, the promotion of black-owned businesses, and the creation of a sense of pride in African heritage.
C) The IWW (Industrial Workers of the World):
The IWW, also known as the Wobblies, was a radical labor union that aimed to unite all workers, regardless of race or ethnicity, in their fight for labor rights.
While they fought against worker exploitation and discrimination in the workplace, their primary focus was not on challenging racial discrimination through the legal system. They were more oriented toward direct action, strikes, and labor organizing.
D) The NWSA (National Woman Suffrage Association):
The NWSA, led by Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton, was primarily concerned with women’s suffrage and women’s rights. While their work was crucial in securing women’s right to vote through the 19th Amendment in 1920, their main focus was not on challenging racial discrimination.
In fact, their organization was criticized for not doing enough to address the intersection of gender and racial discrimination, particularly the exclusion of Black women from suffrage efforts.
In conclusion, the NAACP is the correct answer because it used the legal system as a powerful tool to challenge racial discrimination in the United States. Through landmark cases, advocacy, and strategic litigation, the NAACP played a pivotal role in dismantling institutionalized racism and advancing civil rights for African Americans.
While the other organizations mentioned were important in their own right, they did not primarily use the legal system to challenge racial discrimination as the NAACP did.
Legal System and NAACP
A legal system is an incomparable unit of law created by the hierarchical systematisation of all existing legal norms and their classification into smaller or bigger, lower or higher related groups. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) is a civil rights organization in the United States, founded in 1909 by WEB Du Bois, Mary White Ovington, Moorfield Storey, and Ida B. Wells to advance justice for African Americans.
Its mission is to ensure the political, educational, and social equality of minority groups as citizens of states and to eliminate all forms of racism. By using democratic processes, the NAACP aims to remove all barriers of discrimination.The NAACP is an interracial American organization whose mission is to oppose racism, ensure African Americans’ constitutional rights, and abolish segregation in housing, education, employment, voting, and transportation.
Which legal system is found in most former colonies of the united kingdom?
A) common law
B) religious law
C) bureaucratic law
D) civil law
The Correct Answer for the given question is Option A) common law
Common law is derived from judicial decisions instead of statutes. Common law is a body of unwritten laws which develop from legal precedents established by courts. Common law is used to make decisions in unusual cases where the outcome cannot be determined by existing statutes or written rules of law.
Common-law in the United States developed out of a British tradition that spread throughout North America during the 17th and 18th centuries. Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, India, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom also practice common law. In common law, judicial authorities and public juries offer institutionalized opinions and interpretations.
Similarly to civil law, the goal of common law is to establish consistent results by using the same standards of interpretation. Certain precedents are determined by the traditions of the individual jurisdictions. Thus, common law elements may differ from district to district.
MBA,BBA.
I am Smirti Bam, an enthusiastic edu blogger with a passion for sharing insights into the dynamic world of business and management through this website.
I hold a MBA degree from Presidential Business School, Kathmandu, and a BBA degree with a specialization in Finance from Apex College,