Moderator vs Mediator
The moderator and mediator play two distinct roles in facilitating discussions, negotiating, or resolving conflicts. Both roles involve guiding the communication process, but they differ based on their objectives, responsibilities, and level of involvement in decision-making.
Let’s examine in more detail the differences between a mediator and a moderator.
Moderator:
A moderator is an impartial individual who facilitates discussions, debates, or meetings, ensuring that they run smoothly and adhere to a predetermined structure or set of rules.
In addition to maintaining order, moderating the conversation and making sure that everyone has an opportunity to express their thoughts are the primary responsibilities of a moderator.
The following characteristics and responsibilities apply to a moderator:
Neutrality and Impartiality:
Moderators ensure all participants feel heard and respected by maintaining neutral and impartial stances throughout the discussion. They do not express personal opinions or take sides.
Setting the Ground Rules:
A moderator establishes or enforces the ground rules or guidelines for the discussion. As a moderator, you will be able to maintain order and foster a productive environment by establishing clear expectations about speaking time limits, turn-taking, respectful communication, and the scope of the topics to be discussed.